FDA promo police spank Aclaris for misleading info in Eskata video

FDA Building 2
FDA's Office of Prescription Drug Promotion sent its third letter of year to Aclaris. (FDA)

Aclaris Therapeutics is the latest pharma on the hot seat with the FDA’s promotion enforcers. In this case, the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion is targeting a DTC video it deems misleading.

OPDP issued its third untitled letter of 2019 for the video centered on Aclaris' skin product Eskata. First aired on the TV talk show "The View"—and no longer available on YouTube—the video features an Aclaris rep interviewing a physician.

In the video, paid Aclaris spokesperson physician Doris Day and "The View" co-host Abby Huntsman discussed Eskata's use, according to the OPDP transcript. Eskata is approved to treat raised age spots also known as seborrheic keratoses.

Free Webinar

From Patient Adherence to Manufacturing Ease - Why Softgels Make Sense for Rx

THIS WEEK: Join Thermo Fisher Scientific’s upcoming webinar to learn why softgels offer numerous benefits for Rx drug development, including enhanced bioavailability, patient compliance and easy scale-up. Register Today!

While OPDP notes the video does include some risk information, and the doctor refers viewers to Eskata.com for more information, that's not enough to satisfy disclosure rules. The video “fails to include prominent, balancing risk information about Eskatam,” the agency says.

OPDP also charges in its letter that efficacy statements in the interview are misleading. One of the doctor's offhand remarks in particular raised eyebrows at the agency. “And, typically in one or two treatments the lesions go away, they resolve, and that’s the end of it," Day said.

RELATED: Pharma ad police issues 2019's first warning over promotion of unapproved imaging drug

Eye on FDA blogger and public relations professional Mark Senak wrote about the latest letter, noting that in the context of fewer OPDP letters this year, this missive might mean the agency is trying to make a specific point. The point this time? Drugmakers need to explicate risks with more than redirects and superscripts and be careful with spokespeople.

Risk omissions, particularly glossing over them or redirecting consumers elsewhere for information, has been an ongoing theme with OPDP. Still, letters to pharma remain few and far between. The OPDP averaged fewer than 10 warning or untitled letters sent annually since 2014.

As for spokespeople, Senak pointed out the inherent danger of misinterpretation.

RELATED: In another misstep for Vivus, FDA's promo police ding misleading Qsymia webpage

“Picking out specific patients to portray outcomes may be almost as risky as having patient testimonials," he said. "With testimonials a portrayal regarding outcomes from treatment [is] naturally often subjective in nature and it is easy for a patient to characterize their experience in a way that departs from what the norm might have been."

Editor's note: A previous version of this story incorrectly identified Abby as an Aclaris representative. She is Abby Huntsman, one of the co-hosts of "The View."

Suggested Articles

North Korean hackers were accused of posing as corporate recruiters in a scheme to breach AstraZeneca's computer systems and steal COVID-19 research.

The FDA has delayed its review of Revance's frown-line injection candidate after it failed to inspect a key manufacturing facility on time.

McKinsey & Company helped guide Purdue's strategy for years and pitched the idea of rebates to distributors for overdoses, according to the NYT.