HCPs Aren’t Ignoring Your Science. They’re Ignoring How (and When) You Deliver It

HCPs Aren’t Ignoring Your Science. They’re Ignoring How (and When) You Deliver It

What did the investment deliver? It's one of the first questions leadership asks after every major congress, and for marketing teams it is rarely an easy one to answer.

Months of planning, faculty alignment and medical, legal and regulatory review sit behind a sizeable budget. It bought you one hour, in one room.

That hour competes with countless parallel sessions, and some of the specialists you most want to reach are elsewhere. Yet EMJ research found that nearly half of HCPs (47%) want to hear from industry before, during and after congress, so the opportunity for engagement shouldn’t end when the symposium does.

In fact, interest is strongest at precisely the point where many congress plans stop. The challenge is making sure your content reaches clinicians at each stage, and it captures their attention when it does.

Deliver beyond the room

You don’t need new content to make a congress investment work harder. The science is as relevant on Monday as it was on Friday in the congress hall, and because it is already approved, it is ready to travel. EMJ research shows where the appetite is:

  • 46% want post-event summaries
  • 41% want on-demand recordings
  • 30% want real-time highlights
  • 20% want pre-event previews


The two most popular formats both arrive after the session has ended.

Extend your reach to the right specialists

That leaves a ready-made audience: the specialists who stayed in clinic or chose a parallel session instead. The content has already been paid for, so every one of them reached after the congress lowers the cost per clinician engaged.

Reaching more clinicians only helps if they are the right ones, though. EMJ research into what motivates HCPs to open a medical email found:

  • 52% clinical relevance
  • 44% a trusted sender
  • 38% a personalised subject line


A specialist publisher such as EMJ ticks all three boxes: relevant evidence from a trusted source, targeted so a session reaches the right HCP at the right time. Whether they act on it depends on how it is presented.

Use format to win attention

Picture where post-congress content actually lands: on a phone checked between patients on a Monday morning, competing with a full inbox and a growing admin list. Whatever the format, it has minutes, not hours, to prove it is worth a clinician’s time.

Static formats can do that well. A symposium review, a simple infographic or a written summary published while the topic is current gives clinicians something clear to save, print or share.

However, interactive formats go further. When EMJ published the same articles in static and interactive versions, with identical evidence in both, the interactive versions delivered:

  • 3x more page views
  • 178% more sessions
  • 180% uplift in engaged sessions
  • 30% more interactions per user


The difference comes down to control: rather than scrolling past a block of text, clinicians can click, explore and answer their way through the same approved science. For example:

  • An interactive article where readers explore the data behind a finding
  • A patient case study with a clinical decision at each step
  • A video split into chapters so clinicians can navigate directly to what is most relevant to them


Interactive content has been EMJ’s highest-performing format for two consecutive years, and that work is earning industry recognition, with shortlistings at both The Drum Marketing Awards and the Marketing Week Awards in 2026.

Report on engagement, not just reach

Sends, opens and downloads show how far content travelled, but on their own they cannot show whether anyone engaged. The most useful reporting is built around the KPIs your team answers to, from engagement by specialty and therapy area to performance across a full campaign.

Interactive formats add another layer, because every click is a signal. You can see:

  • Which sections drew attention
  • Where readers dropped off
  • How clinicians answered knowledge checks


Static content, by contrast, can only tell you it was seen.

That is the answer leadership is really asking for: not “we published it”, but “here is what HCPs engaged with”. With that evidence in hand, the case for next year’s congress budget becomes far easier to make.

Four rules for maximising congress ROI

  • Reuse before you reinvest. Repurpose approved congress content before commissioning new assets.
  • Match format to purpose. Static for clear, accessible summaries; interactive for complex evidence.
  • Build for five minutes, not 50. Break content into short sections or chapters that fit around busy schedules.
  • Measure real engagement. Track what clinicians read, explore and complete, and use it to shape the next campaign.


The symposium bought you one hour, in one room. With the right plan, that hour is only the beginning.

The editorial staff had no role in this post's creation.