Roche yanks Tecentriq kidney cancer applications as Merck, Pfizer speed toward approvals

tecentriq
Roche's Tecentriq-Avastin combo won't be vying with rival cocktails from Merck, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb in kidney cancer, at least for now. (Roche)

Roche’s immuno-oncology rivals are hurtling toward a showdown in previously untreated kidney cancer. But the Swiss drugmaker has decided to pull its horse out of the race.

Roche has withdrawn applications to both the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for a combination of Tecentriq and Avastin in first-line patients, a spokeswoman confirmed via email. The company cited “results that are not sufficient to support an extension of indication” in its letter (PDF) to European regulators.

The Basel-based company filed the applications earlier this year on the back of data from its phase 3 IMmotion151 study, which showed the Tecentriq-Avastin regimen could top Pfizer’s Sutent at cutting the risk of disease worsening or death in patients whose tumors expressed biomarker PD-L1.

Sponsored by Lubrizol Life Science

[Webinar] Cannabinoid Formulation - from Farm to Pharma

Wednesday, June 24, 2020 | 12pm ET / 9am PT

A handful of cannabinoid-based pharmaceutical products are on the market today, and an ever-growing number are in the global development pipeline. This webinar will explore key considerations in developing cannabinoid-based pharmaceutical products, including an overview of global pharmaceutical cannabinoid usage today, common challenges formulating with CBD and other cannabinoids, and more.

RELATED: Roche touts more Tecentriq-plus-Avastin data, this time in kidney cancer

Since then, though, plenty has changed in the kidney cancer landscape, setting Roche’s rivals up to make a splash. Last month, partners Pfizer and Merck KGaA unveiled data showing that a pairing of their PD-1/PD-L1 entrant, Bavencio, and Sutent follow-up Inlyta could stave off cancer progression by a median 13.8 months, compared with 8.4 months for Sutent. In PD-L1-positive patients, the 13.8-month benefit nearly doubled Sutent’s at 7.2 months.

And just a few days prior, Merck took things a couple steps further with the top-line announcement that a combination of its Keytruda and Inlyta had not only shown it could keep cancer at bay for longer than Sutent, but that it could beat out the standard-of-care at extending patients’ lives, too. And those benefits were consistent across PD-L1 expression levels, the New Jersey drugmaker said.

RELATED: Pfizer preps for Bristol-Myers Squibb showdown with Bavencio kidney cancer combination data

With the Tecentriq-Avastin cocktail, Roche would have had to go up against both those regimens sooner or later—and that’s not to mention Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Opdivo-Yervoy duo, which has been snatching up front-line market share in the U.S. since its April green light. And while Bristol’s one-two punch has been stymied in Europe thanks to the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use—it shot down the combo in July—that may be about to change. Last week, the committee did an about face, recommending the cocktail for first-line use.

Roche isn’t throwing in the towel completely, though. The IMmotion151 study will continue as planned until the pharma giant knows whether its combo can extend patients’ lives, and “we will continue to evaluate the results from the study,” the spokeswoman said.

“Based on data we have available, we believe that the combination of Tecentriq and Avastin may play a role in the treatment of advanced kidney cancer, which remains an area of high unmet medical need where people need more treatment options,” she added.

Suggested Articles

Changes in drug development have created the need for CDMOs to be more adaptive and responsive to evolving requirements. Are you ready for the future?

Sanofi's Sarclisa is coming full-force at Johnson & Johnson blockbuster Darzalex in the multiple myeloma field—now backed by new data.

The antidepressant Zoloft and its generics are in short supply as the COVID-19 pandemic has caused higher demand and manufacturing interruptions.