FDA marketing police send 2018's first enforcement letter to Collegium over misleading opioid exhibit booth

fda
OPDP sent just five letters in 2017. (FDA)

It’s no Kardashian kerfuffle, but the FDA's ad police have sent their first letter of the year. The untitled letter sent to Collegium Pharmaceuticals tackles a hot-topic category, opioids, over a misleading booth at a pharmacists’ convention.

The Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) sent the letter over advertising for Collegium's branded oxycodone drug, Xtampza ER. The problem? The exhibit booth failed to “adequately communicate” risk information, OPDP said. 

The offense occurred last year in June at the meeting of the American Society Health-System Pharmacists in Minneapolis. An OPDP representative on site spotted the issue.

3-Day Conference

6th Promotional Review Committee Compliance & Best Practices Conference

The leading U.S. event devoted to building the skills, speed and teamwork of your promotional review committee members will take place May 15–17, 2019 in Chicago. The conference is set to bring together more than 75 professionals to ensure your PRC is prepared to generate, collect and constructively act on expert comments for your entire drug and device portfolio.

Collegium's Xtampza was already on OPDP’s radar. As OPDP noted in the February warning, it had communicated advice to Collegium earlier regarding Xtampza when the drugmaker submitted its draft presentations. In September 2016, OPDP said it gave advisory comments that recommended Collegium make revisions on what it had submitted.

“In particular, we cautioned Collegium about failing to present risk information for Xtampza ER with a prominence and readability reasonably comparable to the presentation of benefits. We are concerned that Collegium is promoting Xtampza ER in a manner that fails to adequately present the very serious risks of the drug, despite this direction from OPDP,” the letter noted.

RELATED: What do new FDA letters dinging 'misleading' pharma TV ads mean for the industry?

Eye on FDA blogger and public relations professional Mark Senak noted in a blog post last week that the letter is significant for two reasons. He said it shows that OPDP is still actively enforcing policies, despite a very low number of letters sent in 2017. The move also sends a message to drugmakers in the opioid category—already under heavy fire from government agencies as well as consumers—that they should probably carefully review promotions, especially when it comes to risk, he said.

OPDP sent five letters in 2017, which was the lowest in its history, although more typical of recent years. OPDP did send more in 2016, with a total of 11, but overall numbers have been on the decline since 1998, when it sent a whopping 156.

In 2015, for instance, the OPDP sent just nine letters to pharma companies for marketing violations, down from 10 in 2014.

Suggested Articles

A North Carolina federal jury found that Puma maliciously defamed Eshelman amid a proxy fight that began in late 2015.

Merck KGaA says it will invest €1 billion in its headquarters site in Darmstadt, Germany, as part of a five-year agreement reached with workers there.

Novo turned in its FDA application on Wednesday for oral semaglutide, which analysts believe will eventually pull in billions of dollars annually.