AACR: BMS, clinging to Opdivo's lung cancer share, highlights long-term data

58% of those who had responded to Opdivo at the six-month mark were still alive four years later, a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies showed. (Bristol-Myers Squibb)

ATLANTA—After a hard blow to its hopes in previously untreated lung cancer, Bristol-Myers Squibb is clinging to its share of the second-line market. And it’s hoping new long-term data can help it hang on.

Tuesday at the American Association for Cancer Research, the New Jersey drugmaker shared results from a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who had received previous treatment. And they showed that at the four-year mark, 14% of all Opdivo-treated patients were still alive, compared with just 5% of those who had received chemo instead.

What’s more, 58% of those who had responded to Opdivo at the six-month mark, either partially or completely, were still alive four years later, versus just 12% of chemo patients.

Free Daily Newsletter

Like this story? Subscribe to FiercePharma!

Biopharma is a fast-growing world where big ideas come along daily. Our subscribers rely on FiercePharma as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data on drugs and the companies that make them. Sign up today to get pharma news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

 “We always said that one of the hallmarks of immuno-oncology is durability of response and that durability is important. Here we can now see a clear demonstration of how response status … impacts overall survival,” Sabine Maier, M.D., Bristol’s development lead for thoracic cancers, said.

In Bristol’s presentation, you could “see how flat” the Opdivo curve was, Maiers added. “Those patients tend to survive very long” versus the chemo arm, in which “you see a constant decline over time as patients lose their response and keep dying.”

The way she sees it, the analysis has “direct implications” for patients who receive Opdivo in the second-line setting—and for doctors who prescribe it. The results should help physicians talk to their patients about treatment decisions and reassure patients about their long-term outcomes.

“I think it’s very important for them to understand that once you hit the six-month landmark, what your survival expectations actually are in that setting,” she said.

RELATED: Bristol-Myers surprise: Threatened I-O drug Opdivo stands its ground in lung cancer

Bristol-Myers Squibb last year surprised analysts by hanging onto a good portion of Opdivo’s second-line share despite stellar survival data that boosted uptake of Merck archrival Keytruda in new patients—and shrunk Bristol’s patient pool accordingly.

Investors, though, have worried the company won’t be able to keep it up, and that Opdivo will soon be faltering in the other indication fueling its success—in kidney cancer—thanks to Keytruda competition, too.

RELATED: The skeptics were right: Bristol-Myers has pulled a crucial Opdivo lung filing as it awaits more data

Meanwhile, though, BMS’ decision to yank its application for an Opdivo-Yervoy combo in front-line lung cancer has confirmed their worst fears: that Opdivo is still a long ways away from challenging Keytruda in immuno-oncology’s most lucrative market.

Suggested Articles

FDA officials say Novartis took too long to launch a formal probe into allegations of Zolgensma data manipulation.

Should Johnson & Johnson owe billions to fix Oklahoma's opioid crisis? After weeks of trial testimony, a judge will have his say Monday afternoon.

After Endo and Allergan agreed to settle with two Ohio counties on opioid charges this week, the state’s AG has a message: You’re not off the hook.