Litigation teaches Chinese valsartan maker the downside of U.S. market

China flag
China’s Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical reported to the Shanghai Stock Exchange that it has been named in litigation in the U.S. (Getty Images)

China’s Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical for years enjoyed the upside of the U.S. pharmaceutical market, selling its valsartan API to drugmakers producing blood pressure meds for the market. Now it is seeing the downside, having its products banned by the FDA and facing litigation over the discovery of a suspected carcinogen in its API.

The Chinese company disclosed (PDF) to the Shanghai Stock Exchange that it has been named in multiple lawsuits, according to a translated copy of the filing. The disclosure says Huahai has been named in lawsuits in Missouri, New Jersey, Illinois and New York with allegations including gross negligence, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract and unjust enrichment.

The FDA on Friday said it has put Huahai on its import alert list, banning its products from the U.S. The company, whose APIs are in about half of the valsartan blood pressure medicines sold in the U.S., last summer instigated a global recall of its products.

Cambrex Webinar

Understanding the Importance of Crystallization Processes to Avoid Unnecessary Cost, Risk and Development Delays

Wednesday, May 27, 2020 | 10am ET / 7am PT

A well-developed crystallization process can produce suitable particles that can facilitate consistent filtration, drying and formulation of the API and allow confident and reliable manufacturing of the final drug product, while avoiding unnecessary cost, risk and development delays.

RELATED: FDA berates Chinese drugmaker tied to global valsartan recall

Huahai ran into trouble with the FDA and European regulators after it was discovered that the impurity N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a suspected cancer causing agent, had been showing up in its API, the result of a manufacturing change the drugmaker made years ago. While the levels of NDMA in Huahai’s valsartan API were trace amounts, they were considered unacceptable, the FDA has said. Further testing has also found N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), another suspected carcinogen, in the API.

In a Form 483 issued to the drugmaker in August, the FDA berated the company's management for making the process changes without thoroughly testing them. It also documents that the changes in producing the API were made in 2011, much earlier than originally suggested.

RELATED: FDA finds more impurities in recalled high blood pressure drug valsartan

The litigation has sprung from these developments. The company in its filing to the stock exchange said “There is still uncertainty in the outcome of the litigation, and the company is still unable to accurately determine the impact on the current profit and the profit after the period.”

Its shares on Monday fell more than 10% after it disclosed the FDA last week banned its products from the U.S.

Suggested Articles

BMS' Opdivo and Yervoy only just won their first approval in previously untreated metastatic NSCLC, but the pair is already making it two.

Wrapping up the legal battle at $10 billion would be a win for Bayer, as it has lost $30 billion in market value since the Monsanto buyout.

Takeda’s Alunbrig has arrived in previously untreated, ALK-positive NSCLC. But there’s plenty of competition waiting to greet it at the door.