Endo comes out on top in its fight with FDA and bulk compounder 

Endo International subsidiary Par makes Vasostrict, a drug that brought in about $453 million last year. Endo has dropped its long-running litigation which first found it as a legal foe, then a friend, of the FDA in a fight against bulk compounders who were making the API in Vasostrict. (Getty Images)

While Endo International continues to face big legal challenges tied to opioid production, the drugmaker has prevailed in its two-front fight with the FDA and bulk compounders. The resolution has ended competition for its vessel constrictor Vasostrict.

The drugmaker today said that it has dropped its litigation against the FDA, which was filed in 2017 when the agency looked to have opened the floodgates for bulk compounders to make their own versions of vasopressin, the API for Vasosrict, a drug that generated $453 million for Endo last year. When the FDA amended its draft guidelines to stop compounders from making vasopressin, one of those compounders sued the FDA and Endo then joined the FDA in that fight.

RELATED: Endo presses pause on litigation after FDA assurance to sort out compounding competition by year-end

Free Amazon Webinar

Performing end to end real-world evidence generation in the cloud with traceability and transparency- a Sanofi journey

In this webinar you will hear about Sanofi’s journey and experience in building an industrialized big data & analytics platform in the cloud that handles billions of rows of RWD data with complete data traceability, security, and supports both traditional and advanced analytics for day to day evidence generation (RWE).

Endo today said that a federal court in August upheld the FDA’s decision to prevent compounding of vasopressin and that Ahtenex, the compounder that sued, has now dropped its appeal. With the competition put to rest, Endo said it was comfortable dismissing its litigation with the FDA.

Endo made nice by congratulating the FDA for its “successful and well-reasoned implementation” of Section 503B of the drug quality safety act. 

"In light of FDA's determination that bulk compounding of vasopressin is impermissible under Section 503B and the Court's decision to uphold that determination, we have agreed with the Department of Justice and the FDA to voluntarily dismiss Endo's lawsuit," Matthew J. Maletta, Endo’s chief legal officer said in a statement.   

RELATED: Are J&J, Endo and Allergan in line for 'global' opioid settlements?

While the ruling is specific to vasopressin, it is believed to have precedent for other drugmakers whose drugs are targeted by large-scale compounders for generic competition.

The resolution of this legal battle comes as Endo is in the process of also settling litigation with some counties in Ohio over the manufacturing of its opioid products. 


Suggested Articles

Nearly four decades after it was approved, the FDA has ordered that heartburn drug Zantac and its generics be removed from the market.

In a non-randomized study in China, Avigan cleared virus after a median 4 days, significantly shorter than the 11 days observed for AbbVie's Kaletra.

Pfizer's 1.1-million-square-foot sterile injectables plant in Visakhapatnam has been criticized by the FDA for poor quality testing.