With Big Pharma mergers in the works, whose SG&A costs look ripe for cutting?

When Big Pharma starts talking about big buyouts, the sales and marketing departments start chattering about their jobs. Last week's Novartis-plus-GlaxoSmithKline cancer deal is one prime example. Another, bigger one: Pfizer's proposed $100-billion-or-so buyout of AstraZeneca.

Worries about job losses have U.K. officials looking for reassurance from Pfizer ($PFE), but Pfizer isn't biting--at least, not until AstraZeneca ($AZN) agrees to sit down and talk. But government ministers are focused on R&D and scientists, not sales and marketing folks. And as anyone in pharma sales knows, SG&A expenses are often the top brass' first target when integrating two companies.

Novartis ($NVS) wouldn't share any details with us about its cancer marketing plans, citing their proprietary nature. But since that deal was announced last Tuesday, Glaxo ($GSK) won approval for one of its new cancer drugs, and Novartis nabbed an OK for its targeted lung cancer product Zykadia. Read more from FiercePharmaMarketing >>

Suggested Articles

Turns out Procter & Gamble didn’t want Pfizer’s consumer health unit after all. But it did want Merck KGaA’s.

Private equity firm, in exclusive talks with Sanofi, says it'll invest to pump up Zentiva into an "independent European generics leader."

With suitor Takeda circling Shire, the Dublin-based target has pulled off a deal of its own.