FierceBiotechFierceBioResearcherFierceVaccinesFiercePharma   FierceHealthcare

Free Newsletter

Get the pharma industry's daily monitor, with a special focus on pharmaceutical company news and the market development of FDA approved products. Sign up for free today!

About | Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> lawsuit | Prempro | Pfizer | Wyeth

Wyeth wrestles with Prempro suits

Two women in Nevada claimed that Prempro and Premarin led to them developing breast cancer, and rather than go to trial, Wyeth paid the women an undisclosed settlement amount.  The women asserted that Wyeth did not adequately warn them about their increased risk of developing breast cancer because of taking the menopause medications. 

According to Wyeth, the company has more than 5,000 lawsuits regarding the menopause meds facing it, but plaintiff attorneys say the real number is likely double that.  It has lost four out of seven cases so far. Prizer will also continue to hit the courts over its drug, Provera. So far, it's zero for two.  

On July 11, New Jersey Judge Jamie Happas dismissed two lawsuits aimed at Wyeth and Pfizer's Pharmacia & Upjohn unit, saying the plaintiffs did not provide sufficient proof that the companies failed to warn them adequately.

The drugs are still on the market, despite the fact that women taking these medicines have almost a 25 percent increased risk of breast cancer, according to a 2002 study. Over 6 million women have taken the drugs, which have brought Wyeth in excess of $2 billion dollars in sales.

- see the LA Times story
- read more at MarketWatch 

 Related Articles:
Wyeth appealing two hormone verdicts
Court dismisses lawsuit on Wyeth's Prempro
Jury fines Wyeth $134.5M in hormone suit
Wyeth asks judge to cut $134M award

More stories about lawsuit   Prempro   Pfizer   Wyeth  

Comments

Sometimes I wonder what is wrong with these Judges. My mother died of ovarian cancer from
taking Premarin. She also had gallbadder poblems and heart problems which lead to a triple bi-pass and a pacemaker. If these Judges had a loved one in thier family suffer from cancer, I believe thier decesion would be much different. They did not properly warn of the dangers. Why is this drug still prescribed? I wish they would settle instead of dragging all of this out.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 1 + 13?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.