FierceBiotechFierceBioResearcherFierceVaccinesFiercePharma   FierceHealthcare

Free Newsletter

Get the pharma industry's daily monitor, with a special focus on pharmaceutical company news and the market development of FDA approved products. Sign up for free today!

About | Sample | Privacy

Tough HIV drug ads draw fire

Tools

There's no question that the HIV drug market is getting crowded. Newer meds like Gilead Sciences' Truvada and Merck's Isentress are on the rise, and GlaxoSmithKline's older drugs--Combivir and Trizivir, for instance--are losing market share. So it's no wonder that drugmakers have unveiled their versions of a political campaign's "attack" ads, pointing out the side effects of competing treatments or aiming to persuade patients to stick with the regimen they're on.

The question is, have the ads gone too far? Some AIDS advocacy groups think so. An activist group officially complained to GlaxoSmithKline about one ad--which pictures shark-infested waters, advising "stick with the HIV medicine that's working for you--saying that it's offensive and designed to make patients afraid of switching. Another advocacy organization says it has complained directly to the Department of Health and Human Services about another GSK ad pointing out the side effects of competing protease inhibitors.

Compared to other advertising, these ads aren't so tough. But traditionally, AIDS-med ads have focused on the positive. And not only are activists concerned that patients could be scared off their doctors' advice. Physicians have expressed worries, too. The drugmakers say that the ads are educational and appropriate, and that patients should make sure to talk to their doctors about the side effects of any new meds.

- read the Wall Street Journal story

Related Articles:
This year's drug ads? Forget about 'em
Drugmakers to delay new-drug ads
Marketing lessons from FDA warnings
Congress asks CEOs to pledge truth in DTC
Will DTC hearing lead to new regulation?

More stories about Drug Marketing   HIV   GlaxoSmithKline   DTC advertising  

Comments

While the appropriateness of advertisement content may be a real issue, it is a fact that abacavir-containing medicines {GSK}are now the "preferred" medicines for new HIV patients. Its safety profile has been markedly improved due to the high predictive value of HLA-B*5701 testing for the major side-effect (hypersensitivity syndrome) published in 2008. See "Guidelines for the Use of Retroviral Agents in HIV-1-infected Adults and Children," DHHS Panel, Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council (OARAC), January 29, 2008.

There are accepted HIV treater guidelines for changing HIV drugs in patients who are failing on their current drug regimen (usually three or more antiretroviral drugs). There are no guidelines for changing HIV regimens in patients who are stable and without significant adverse events. Problems may arise when these stable HIV patients see "grass is greener" type information about competing drugs without understanding the unique short and long term potential adverse events of each drug and with each combination of drugs, or with the unique viral mutations associated with each drug combination failure. The choice of HIV drugs can be a VERY complex issue that may impact the patient and their HIV treatment options for the rest of their life. HIV patients who are stable and meeting their treatment goals should work with their healthcare provider to carefully understand and evaluate the potential risks vs the expected benefits before changing their drug regimen. There is a seven-question patient's checklist that can be downloaded and printed from www.haarttohaart.com. The checklist may be useful to facilitate the patient's interaction with their healthcare provider and may help them better evaluate their choice.

But hang on, isn't it possible that Pharma is for once doing us a bit of a favour?

One of the biggest problems we have on the HIV prevention front these days is making young people, the post-AIDS generation, aware that HIV is something better prevented than treated. While I'm sure Big Pharama doesn't mean to, they are inadvertently helping out with that by raising the profile of the side-effects of one another's products.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 40 + 47?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.