Free Newsletter
A tale of Novartis vs. Roche
It's a tale of two companies, Swiss style. The Financial Times compares pharma rivals Roche and Novartis, whose headquarters are both in Basel, Switzerland. Just about a mile apart, in fact. But as the FT outlines, their strategies are almost polar opposites. And those strategies for dealing with pharma's current challenges exemplify an industry-wide split.
On on side, there's Roche, a proponent of pure pharma. Roche swallowed its U.S. biotech partner Genentech earlier this year in a $42 billion deal that cemented its focus on specialty meds and diagnostics. Much of Roche's revenues come from high-tech meds like Avastin, its cancer treatment that's been called a pipeline in one drug. Such treatments bear big price tags, and they don't require enormous primary-care sales forces, the FT points out.
On the other, there's Novartis, which takes a more diversified approach, with both primary-care and specialty drugs, generic meds, vaccines, and a growing presence in eyecare, helped by its recent investment in Alcon.
Standing with Roche, as the FT sees it, are AstraZeneca, which bought MedImmune--strengthening its biologics business--and since has stayed out of the big-deal arena. Its "smaller scale" makes it forever the subject of buyout talk, like the rumors recently circulating of a Novartis-Astra combo. Eli Lilly, despite its animal health division, is more pure pharma than diversified business, too, the FT says.
On the Novartis side? GlaxoSmithKline, which has a big OTC business and generics operations. Pfizer, which is buying Wyeth in part to build its vaccine biz and get back into OTC products. Sanofi-Aventis has also expanded its generics and animal health operations, and is considering further growth in animal health and vaccines.
It's a different approach to the usual juxtaposition of megamerger types and bolt-on-deal types, which puts Pfizer, Merck, and Roche on the former side and Glaxo, Sanofi, and Novartis on the other. Which approach do you think is more valid? Any classifications you'd like to suggest?
- read the FT story
ALSO: Novartis has gained U.S. approval for a combination of its blockbuster blood pressure drug Diovan and its follow-up product Tekturna/Rasilez. Report
Related Articles:
Roche shuffles execs in drugs, diagnostics
Roche: Goodbye PhRMA and ABPI, hello BIO
Roche execs take Genentech reins
Vasella shaking up Novartis ops
Novartis nabs Ebewe for generics push
Comments
Glaxo started out as a milk products company in New Zealand, Beecham as a patent medicine company in St Helens England. Beecham stayed with its diversified range while Glaxo, acquiring Allen and Hanburys and ultimately Wellcome divested itself of the non-medicine side (at one time it sold garden fertilizers and weedkillers as well as blackcurrant pastilles) and became pure pharma like Merck. Attempts at OTC (Glaxo Rx ?)bombed until Zantac(R) came off patent. With the merger of GW and SB the Beecham non-medical products became important, see the locozade(R) tie-up in China. With Witty as CEO, following a serious expansion into developing markets, I think it will stay with a mix of novel medicines and OTC, after all OTCs start as prescription only meds. Getting the balance right is important and I think the R&D base in GSK is every bit as strong as those of Roche and Merck
I worked for Glaxo / GW / GSK for 20 years, and throughout that whole period the scrip / OTC dream was the pot of gold used to justify numerous re-orgs, mergers, investments, re-structuring and aquisitions. It will be interesting to see if they finally crack it with Witty leading the company (and don't forget in the US, the Zantac OTC was driven by selling it to Warner-Lambert, not by GW sales and marketing)
You failed some of Roche's diversifications - Diagnostics is a large part of its business.
In addition I believe NVS owns about 38% of Roche shares which is how I play owning both! They are both great companies! I even have gone down the bio chain from Roche who now owns all of DNA to a small bio called CRIS partnered w/ DNA, where I have bought into the IP in cancer!
I am retired now from Bayer/SGP and invest in this space almost exclusively! Thanx for your great articles!
frank
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- The Specialty Pharma Market Outlook: Key players, new company growth models and emerging opportunities
- Investigating Clinical Trial Costs: Comparative analysis of trial cost components in key geographies
- Clinical Trial Recruitment Strategies: Optimizing patient recruitment and retention in late stage clinical trials
- Pipeline Insight: Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines - Prospect of first approval set to reinvigorate interest from major companies
- Stakeholder Opinions: Vaccines in Emerging Markets (Asia) - Opportunities in China, India, South Korea and Taiwan
- Big Pharma Performance Before, During and Beyond the Global Recession






SHARE
WITH: