Free Newsletter
| Get the pharma industry's daily monitor, with a special focus on pharmaceutical company news and the market development of FDA approved products. Sign up for free today! |
Study: Last-minute drugs less safe
When FDA reviewers cram, do they perform poorly on the test? A new study concludes that yes, when drugs are approved right on deadline, they're more likely to cause safety problems later. The Harvard analysis, published in this week's New England Journal of Medicine, concludes that drugs approved in the two months leading up to the deadline are four to five times more likely to be withdrawn or require serious safety warnings. Think Pfizer's rezulin, withdrawn on liver problems. Bayer's Baycol, taken off the market because of muscle damage. Or Vioxx, spiked for its increased risk of heart attack and stroke.
Drugs approved faster didn't have the same safety profile, and nor were meds whose approval missed the deadline.
Some background: When Congress OK'd user fees to allow FDA to hire more reviewers, it imposed a 12-month deadline on approvals; later that timeframe was shortened to 10 months. The idea was that drug companies might be forced to pay for review, but they should at least get quick service as a result. Critics have since suggested that the deadlines might cause the FDA to make hasty decisions.
The new study appears to bolster those concerns. But the FDA shot back quickly when its concussions were released, releasing its own stats that showed an increase in withdrawals among drugs OK'd on deadline, but not enough to be statistically significant. "FDA won't approve a drug if we are not ready," CDER chief Dr. Janet Woodcock (photo) told the Washington Post. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Woodcock also has said that the deadlines caused "a sweatshop atmosphere" at the agency, leading to staff turnover. (A spokesman said she wouldn't say the same thing today.) But more debate is sure to come.
- read the Washington Post article
- get more from the WSJ
- check out the item in the Boston Globe
Related Articles:
Top 10 Drug Warnings and Recalls of 2007. Report
PDUFA debate highlights drug safety issues. Report
Developers: Politics behind slow approval process. Report
The FDA: Caught between a rock and a hard place. Report
FDA quick to reject drugs as it gets more cautious. Report
Comments
I used to work in Clinical Trials for many years. I could write a book on "The Cooking of the Books" methods that Big Pharm & the FDA uses to get "drugs on trial" passed for sale. If I wrote a book, Big Pharm, the FDA & Institutional Review Boards would all be quickly going down the drain like fast water!
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- RNA therapy: the next big thing after monoclonal antibodies?
- Biotech M&A Strategies: Deal assessments, trends and future prospects
- The Dermatology Market Outlook to 2013: Competitive landscape, pipeline analysis and growth opportunities
- Pipeline Insight: Cancer Overview - Breast, Gynecological, Genitourinary - Diverse drugs approaching the market for many tumor t
- Sales Force Effectiveness
- Forecast Model: Antidyslipidemics - Genericization and negative trial data drive market shrinkage


