Free Newsletter
| Get the pharma industry's daily monitor, with a special focus on pharmaceutical company news and the market development of FDA approved products. Sign up for free today! |
Preemption debate heats up
That little legal argument known as preemption is back in the news. You know the one: That FDA approval, being federal, supersedes any state-court lawsuits over blessed drugs and devices. Pushed by the Bush Administration, it's set for a Supreme test this fall when the U.S.'s highest court hears a case in which Wyeth claims it shouldn't be liable for claims about an FDA-approved med.
The latest? Supreme Court justices have had to recuse themselves from various cases lately because of their pharma-stock holdings. Yesterday, it was Samuel Alito bowing out because of Bristol-Myers stock. (Four of the nine justices had to sit out of that case, which involved a laundry list of big U.S. companies.) Two months ago, it was Chief Justice John Roberts sitting out a case involving Pfizer. Given the fact that ratifying preemption as a legal defense wouldn't simply help Wyeth, but all drugmakers, will the two men recuse themselves from that case, too? Inquiring minds want to know.
Meanwhile, Congress is dipping into the preemption fray with a hearing on the concept tomorrow. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform--Rep. Henry Waxman's group--is calling a bunch of preemption opponents to testify. On the roster: Actor Dennis Quaid, who's suing Baxter over a heparin overdose given to his infant twins.
- see the item at Pharmalot
- check out the hearing announcement
Related Articles:
If J&J misled FDA, can patients sue?
Proposed FDA rule riles lawyers
Bush: FDA's word shields against lawsuits
Supremes to mull block on drug suits
Comments
FDA makes their decisions to release products for market on the basis of data submitted by the manufacturers. FDA does not have the ability to do this research due to the number of products being researched at any one time. They rely on the HONESTY and HIGH QUALITY RESEARCH of the companies.This data is reviewed by a panel of experts not employed by FDA. FDA usually accepts this review, however, they do not have to. Sometime times they reject the experts and require more data. Their have been occasions where companies have deliberately withheld data only to be found out later. Companies have a huge investment, consequently, they have been known to "take a chance" and put one over on FDA. Eventually they will get caught but the income derived until then usually covers the expense of research.
Companies are responsible for the data they present to FDA. When a drug is approved and widely used it is possible new information develops on a large scale that was not obvious in small scale research studies. FDA can not be responsible for data NOT reported. Someone has to be responsible, therefore, the company must answer as it was their data that was presented. I hope FDA has lawyers smart enough to present this in a manner that allows the judge to recognize where the responsibility lies.
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- RNA therapy: the next big thing after monoclonal antibodies?
- Biotech M&A Strategies: Deal assessments, trends and future prospects
- The Dermatology Market Outlook to 2013: Competitive landscape, pipeline analysis and growth opportunities
- Pipeline Insight: Cancer Overview - Breast, Gynecological, Genitourinary - Diverse drugs approaching the market for many tumor t
- Sales Force Effectiveness
- Forecast Model: Antidyslipidemics - Genericization and negative trial data drive market shrinkage


