Free Newsletter
Insurers' drug-switching push prompts warning
Big Pharma may have found some unexpected allies in its battle against generic competition: consumer groups. Two advocacy organizations in Florida are warning consumers about "therapeutic switching," which goes one step beyond straight generic substitution. Insurers are urging their members to try cheaper generic forms of their meds, and sometimes this means moving not to a generic equivalent, but to a generic drug in the same class, the groups warn. For instance, a patient using Pfizer's cholesterol-fighter Lipitor might be encouraged to switch to simvastatin, a generic version of Merck's Zocor.
As you know, simvastatin and Lipitor are not necessarily created equal. In fact, many drug classes contain meds that, while therapeutically similar, work differently in different patients. Antidepressants in the SSRI class, for instance, don't work exactly the same in a particular patient, so moving from one to another can not only cause side effects, but differences in efficacy.
Consumer Federation of the Southeast and the Florida Public Interest Research Group are trying to get the word out about this type of switching, and are encouraging patients whose insurers are lobbying for a generic drug to discuss the switch with their doctors first.
"There are certain drug classes where it may be safe to switch from one drug to another, and there are others where switching can be dangerous--and the person deciding that should be the patient's physician," Dr. Bruce Rubin, assistant professor of clinical neurology at the University of Miami's Miller School of Medicine, told the Tallahassee Democrat.
- read the story in the Democrat
Related Articles:
Cheaper drugs don't always drive out brands
Make generic-switching bonuses illegal?
Insurers pay docs for generic-switching
Switching to generic statins not so healthy
Comments
IS Lipitor really better than Simvastatin? ...That is a topic for different discussion. Pfizer is grandstanding here.
Since the PBMs have taken over the prescription management business, and the consumers have effectively handed their rights to the insurance companies, it is silly to whine when drug substitutions are made to serve the bottom line of the insurance company that has a contract with the PBM. The PBMs are in a position to do a lot of harm to the economy. They could potentially contract with the drug companies for volume discounts and charge more for prescription drugs substituted for Generics and pass on the expense to the insurance companies and consumers. The first step in the control of runaway costs is to ban PBMS. They are unnecessary. The 2nd step is to remove all restrictions against open bidding by Pharma companies. If they are forced to compete in the world market, prices will fall. We will not need PBMS. Consumers can make their choice with the help of their physicians.
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- The Top 10 Biosimilar Players: Positioning, performance and SWOT analyses
- New Approaches to Pharma R&D: Evolving strategies to rejuvenate R&D efficiency
- Stakeholder Opinions: Vaccine antigen delivery technologies - Molecular systems to open new markets
- The Top 10 Contract Research Organizations
- Stakeholder Opinions: Vaccine administration technologies - Beyond needles
- Future Pharmaceutical Industry Trends: Long-term opportunities tempered by short-term challenges





Click here to get the FiercePharma email newsletter for FREE!
Comments (1) | Post a comment