FierceBiotechFierceBioResearcherFierceVaccinesFiercePharma   FierceHealthcare

Free Newsletter

Get the pharma industry's daily monitor, with a special focus on pharmaceutical company news and the market development of FDA approved products. Sign up for free today!

About | Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> GlaxoSmithKline | Chris Viehbacher

GSK loses North American chief

Tools

A $5 million retention bonus apparently wasn't enough to keep Chris Viehbacher (photo) at GlaxoSmithKline. One of the three top GSK execs in the race to succeed Jean-Pierre Garnier as CEO, Viehbacher was passed over in favor of Andrew Witty (photo), who took over officially after the company's annual meeting this spring. To keep Viehbacher at the head of North American operations, GSK gave him a seat on the company's board and a $5 million bonus to be paid in two parts, according to Pharmalot, half at the end of this year, the other half at the end of 2011. David Stout (photo), who also made a bid for the CEO spot, left the company after he was passed over for the top spot.

Well, he won't make it to either date. Viehbacher resigned his board seat effective immediately, and he'll leave the company altogether December 1. In a statement, Witty thanked Viehbacher for "his significant contribution" to the company and wished him well "in his future endeavors." We wonder what those future endeavors will be.

- see the GSK release
- read the Pharmalot post

Related Articles:
GSK investors attack exec pay, performance
GSK shuffles execs in operations overhaul
GSK runners-up get $4M, board seat
GSK CEO also-rans may get on board
At GSK, a public race for the top spot

Update:
GSK's Viehbacher picked as Sanofi CEO

More stories about GlaxoSmithKline   Chris Viehbacher  

Comments

How bad must things at GSK be that $5 million is not enough to keep people at the company?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 18 + 3?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.