Free Newsletter
Flu shots, Relenza to benefit from Tamiflu trouble
In the medical journal equivalent of a newspaper Extra! edition, the Journal of the American Medical Association went to press early with several stories on this year's flu resistance to Roche's antiviral remedy Tamiflu (oseltamivir). According to JAMA--and another review slated for this week's New England Journal of Medicine--Tamiflu resistance has been ID'd in 98.5 percent of the U.S. influenza A viruses tested. That's quite a leap from last year's Tamiflu resistance of 12 percent last year and less than 1 percent two years ago.
Unfortunately, that's the strain of flu that's circulating most widely this winter. "It's really hard to use Tamiflu now in any significant way; there is so much resistance out there," Andrew Pekosz, an associate professor at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, told the Baltimore Sun.
The resistance isn't arising because Tamiflu has been overused, scientists say. Rather, it's influenza's ability to shape-shift that's causing the problem: a natural mutation appears to have boosted resistance to the drug.
So what's the alternative? Vaccination, experts say. Flu season still hasn't peaked, and patients who get shots now can get protection within two weeks. And those who were vaccinated early on may want to get a booster shot, some docs say. Meanwhile, GlaxoSmithKline is reminding folks that its antiflu med Relenza is a "preferred medication" for this year's influenza subtypes. And it has "ample supplies" of the drug available.
- check out the Glaxo release
- see the story in the Los Angeles Times
- read the Sun article
Related Articles:
Roche suffers from Tamiflu resistance
Tamiflu resistant to seasonal strains
Tamiflu weakness is Glaxo's strength
Tamiflu weakness is Glaxo's strength
Roche touts corporate Tamiflu stockpiling
U.S. to boost Tamiflu, Relenza stockpiles
Comments
Drug resistance was so important to the designers of Relenza they did not compromise by changing the structure so that it could be used as a pill. Today their approach has been vindicated, unlike Tamiflu, there are no wild influenza strains resistant to Relenza.
Unfortunately the limits of Relenza usage were never tested, Tamiflu successfully stole Relenza's market, and effectively the funding for further research into a better inhaler and use by injection. Consequently injectable Relenza for children below 5 years of age, and patents with lung complications or systemic infection in hospitals was not developed despite the successful results of trials in the 1990's.
What a pity we weren't warned to consider that Tamiflu tablets contained a resistance prone second rate antiviral, before we embraced the ease of their use.
The fact that resistance didn't result from use but rather from wild strains and a mutation H274Y associated with Tamiflu resistance from the beginning, leads me to think that racing Relenza to market meant Tamiflu won the lucrative sales battle, but may yet loose us the deadly influenza war.
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Vaccines in Emerging Markets (Asia) - Opportunities in China, India, South Korea and Taiwan
- Big Pharma Performance Before, During and Beyond the Global Recession
- Optimizing Lifecycle Management: Maximizing commercial lifespan through label expansion and combination products
- The CRO Market Outlook: Emerging markets, leading players and future trends
- Pharmaceutical Sales Force Effectiveness Strategies
- Commercial Insight: Influenza Vaccines and Antivirals - The pandemic's long-term impact





