Free Newsletter
Doc-gift bans take effect in New England
Today's D-Day in Massachusetts and Vermont--Doctor-gift-law Day. In both states, new legislation takes effect that totally overhauls the rules governing everything from logo notepads to expensive junkets and everything in between. Even free meals will be verboten in Vermont. And though these two states now have the most restrictive pharma-doctor rules in the country, other states are considering similar bans.
As you know, the debate over financial relationships between drugmakers and doctors has really heated up over the last year or so. Congress has been investigating ties among pharma, doctors and academic researchers; lawmakers at the federal and state levels are mulling disclosure rules; medical schools and their teaching hospitals have been overhauling policies on gifts, free samples, speaking fees and consulting, and more. "There is a genuine recognition within the medical profession that the financial entanglements with industry have become problematic," said Allan Coukell, director of the Pew Prescription Project, told the Wall Street Journal.
Some, however, think the pendulum is swinging too far in the opposite direction. As the WSJ points out, some prominent physicians have banded together to oppose the restrictions, saying that financial relationships between doctors and industry aren't bad in and of themselves. What do you think? The WSJ Health Blog is running a "question of the day" about the gift bans, so go on over and have your say. While you're at it, let us know, too.
- read the WSJ story
- check out the Health Blog post
Related Articles:
Vermont gift ban signed into law
Small state, big pharma-payment crackdown
Vermont may get even tougher on pharma
Massachusetts gift bill now law
Comments
Typical day late, dollar short politicians. "Expensive junkets" were in the 90's idiots. Anything to keep the attention off their own incompetence and graft.
Notepads, pens, and free meals may be from the "90's, but the "bribery" and influence peddling is still very much ongoing. Legislation may curtail it a bit, but it will still go on - under the table. Too much money to be made.
The above actually happened in FLorida where a female trial lawyer could not find a Florida MD to deliver her baby she had to travel to Georgia to find one. She couldn't understand that while she made a living sueing physicians that perhaps that MD might not want to take a chance with her in case her pregnancy or baby didn't turn out right.
Served her right. We certainly won't get tort reform under our current trial lawyer in chief obama
Have Vermont and Mass banned political lobby groups yet? Perhaps the doctors will wise up and just leave. They have taken too much flack. Let the politicians heal themselves.
It is ironic that congressmen and senators on both the state & federal level are indignant about the MD-pharma relationship try to impose these regulations on MD but somehow have no problem going on junkets accepting, gifts or meals from their contributors. The hypocrisy is nauseating. I don't a free lunch caused any MD to prescribe a drug inappropriately.
It is about time the physicians fight back. I view it as a fight between lawyers (as most legislators are) and physicians. We need more healthcare providers (MD, RPh, RN) in politics and less lawyers
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Vaccines in Emerging Markets (Asia) - Opportunities in China, India, South Korea and Taiwan
- Big Pharma Performance Before, During and Beyond the Global Recession
- Optimizing Lifecycle Management: Maximizing commercial lifespan through label expansion and combination products
- The CRO Market Outlook: Emerging markets, leading players and future trends
- Pharmaceutical Sales Force Effectiveness Strategies
- Commercial Insight: Influenza Vaccines and Antivirals - The pandemic's long-term impact





