Free Newsletter
| Get the pharma industry's daily monitor, with a special focus on pharmaceutical company news and the market development of FDA approved products. Sign up for free today! |
Big Pharma balks at lawsuit rule
Fighting lawsuits is bad enough. After all, the pharma business is full of them: patent fights, product liability cases, regulatory disputes. Now, the Financial Accounting Standards Board--the accounting organization that sets the rules for companies' numbers-reporting--wants businesses to regularly disclose how much various lawsuits will cost them. Six Big Pharma companies--Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Wyeth--weighed in with a protest.
Estimating those costs is well nigh impossible, not to mention expensive, the companies contended in a letter to FASB. Examples? Take the fight over Merck's painkiller Vioxx. First, a Texas jury awarded one survivor more than $250 million, then a court struck the ruling down completely. Wyeth's fen-phen troubles are also an example. The company thought it might settle those claims for $3.75 billion, but instead has set aside or paid out more than $21 billion in legal fees, judgments and settlements. With numbers all over the map like that, how could estimates be valuable to investors, they argue. A former FASB chairman agrees; he told the Wall Street Journal, "I think the board has gone too far."
- read the WSJ story
Comments
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- RNA therapy: the next big thing after monoclonal antibodies?
- Biotech M&A Strategies: Deal assessments, trends and future prospects
- The Dermatology Market Outlook to 2013: Competitive landscape, pipeline analysis and growth opportunities
- Pipeline Insight: Cancer Overview - Breast, Gynecological, Genitourinary - Diverse drugs approaching the market for many tumor t
- Sales Force Effectiveness


