Competition watchdog details vaccine market concerns


Where some see a small cadre of top-notch vaccine companies, others might see an oligopoly. Where some see innovation, others see hard-to-copy jabs that keep generics away and prices high.

Completed this month, a new report by the Italian Competition Authority raises such concerns about the competitive dynamics in the vaccine market. In its examination, the ICA found an industry that is “dominated by an oligopoly,” with Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur and Pfizer boasting a combined 80% of the market share.


The 13th Annual Digital Pharma East

Digital Pharma East returns to the Pennsylvania Convention Center September 17–20, bringing together over 1000 attendees from biotech and pharma, to better understand how to present business plans, justify budget and innovation, and de-risk proposals getting shut down — essentially, understand how they can return to the office and become champions for their internal digital needs. Join us and save 15% on standard rates when you register with Discount Code DPE19Fierce.

The group said the world vaccine industry, at €23 billion in 2014, is forecast to grow to €35 billion by the end of this year, with many price increases being driven by “innovative” jabs such as those against HPV and pneumococcal disease. However, many vaccine purchasers and those in the public health space haven't changed their perspective on vaccines as prices and profitability have grown, a fact that may have contributed to the market's consolidation, the ICA said.

Another point of emphasis for the ICA: A tiered and “opaque” pricing model that lumps countries together by a variety of unknown characteristics and then assigns prices based on them. Often, vaccine sale agreements can include requirements that the buyers don’t share pricing info, resulting in “informational imbalances” that “can prevent the demand side from carrying out the comparability analyses and cost/opportunity evaluations on which, from the consumers’ perspective, any efficient procurement policy should be based.”

To alleviate this, the ICA said purchasers should be able to access broad vaccine pricing information and that it hopes negotiations can be "balanced ... in the most effective way possible." It added that any confidentiality agreements should be judged on a case-by-case basis.

And while multiple vaccines can in some cases protect against the same disease, differentiation efforts by companies can further the monopolies and cloud the decisionmaking process for purchasers. To tackle this issue, the ICA said that, on an international level, health authorities should examine "the preventive/therapeutic product equivalence" of vaccines and take a stance for purchasers to follow.

Further, because the newer vaccines are complex and have strong patent protection, developing generic vaccines isn’t an option to introduce market competition, the group said. The ICA said it hopes international authorities will examine whether such pathways could work.

Among its other conclusions, the team at the ICA says the vaccines oligopoly is likely to continue even though new players are capable of developing vaccines and implementing their own pricing models.

- here's the release
- and the executive summary

Related Articles:
GSK, Sanofi hauled up by India's competition watchdog on vaccine tenders​
U.K. competition watchdog targets pharma for 'substantial fines'

Suggested Articles

Several Johnson & Johnson drugs are contributing strong growth, but some struggling medicines weighed on the company's overall performance.

J&J has received its fair share of barbs Oklahoma's bench trial. Whether it'll be held responsible for the state's opioid crisis is now up…

J&J's pharma unit is still on the upswing, thanks to newer meds like Stelara, but execs had to explain disappointing numbers from two blockbusters.