Crestor

The drug: Crestor
Company: AstraZeneca/Shionogi
Estimated worldwide sales 2012: $6.65 billion

AstraZeneca ($AZN) has plenty of incentive to keep its cholesterol drug Crestor going strong. The company has suffered some recent R&D defeats, and it lost patent protection on its mega-selling antipsychotic Seroquel in March. The company's future is up in the air, with ex-CEO David Brennan gone and incoming chief Pascal Soriot, hired away from Roche ($RHHBY), just digging in.

So, the fact that Crestor is expected to hold its own this year is a very good thing. And that's in spite of newly minted competition from generic Lipitor, Pfizer's ($PFE) best-selling cholesterol fighter. Last year, AstraZeneca put up $6.62 billion in Crestor sales; this year's total is estimated at $6.65 billion. So far, at least, Crestor hasn't lost much ground to Lipitor knockoffs. For the first half, sales shrank by about 2% to $3.087 billion.

AstraZeneca had hoped that long-term research would give Crestor a performance edge over Lipitor. But though the SATURN study showed Crestor beat Lipitor at lowering cholesterol, the AstraZeneca drug wasn't any better at keeping arteries clear--and that's the result AstraZeneca had been aiming for.

Meanwhile, AstraZeneca has been using one tried-and-true technique to keep patients on its branded drug. The company offers a co-pay assistance card to keep patients' costs down, reducing their incentive to switch to generic Lipitor.

For more:
Big Pharma betting billions in high-stakes hunt for the next Lipitor
AZ's Crestor scored points, but didn't beat Lipitor
AZ launches Crestor co-pay card to battle Lipitor copies
 

Crestor
Read more on

Suggested Articles

Sun Pharma has recalled one lot of its generic metformin after finding high levels of the probable carcinogen NDMA in tested lots.

Six months after WHO declared a pandemic, the list of drugs proven to work against the virus remains short. Now, Fujifilm has added its drug Avigan.

ICER said that Vertex's triplet CF therapy Trikafta would only be cost effective if the price were dropped from $311,000 to no more than $85,500.