Roche pushes back Spark merger deadline as U.S., U.K. antitrust reviews drag on

Roche
Roche pushed back the deadline for its merger with Spark Therapeutics to April 2020. (Roche)

Roche and Spark Therapeutics’ road to a $4.3 billion merger has been a rocky one, with various delays pushing the long-gestating agreement back four times. Now, in order to get all its regulatory ducks in a row, Roche is moving its own deal-close deadline back as well.

Roche moved its Spark closing deadline from Jan. 31, 2020 to April 30, 2020, according to a Monday regulatory filing. The move is a precautionary one, meant to give the deal partners time to clear any hurdles that may come up as U.S. and U.K. antitrust regulators review the companies’ marriage.

In a note to Spark investors, Roche CEO Severin Schwan said the plan was still to close the merger in 2019 despite the new deadline.

Whitepaper

Simplify and Accelerate Drug R&D With the MarkLogic Data Hub Service for Pharma R&D

Researchers are often unable to access the information they need. And, even when data does get consolidated, researchers find it difficult to sift through it all and make sense of it in order to confidently draw the right conclusions and share the right results. Discover how to quickly and easily find, synthesize, and share information—accelerating and improving R&D.

“While we still expect this transaction to close in 2019, we want to ensure that we proactively identify and remove any potential future obstacles to achieving this outcome,” he said. “Good things almost always take time, so as we work to bring this agreement to a close, I ask for your continued patience.”

The new deadline is just the latest delay in the two companies’ star-crossed affair after U.S. regulators asked for a “second review” of the agreement on anti-competition grounds. In early June, Roche pushed back its June 14 tender offer date to July 31 after the Federal Trade Commission filed for an extended investigation.  

RELATED: Roche's Spark buy hits another hurdle as U.S., U.K. antitrust regulators pile on

The repeated pushback from U.S. regulators has been a confusing sticking point for analysts, who don’t see any clear competition concerns in the proposed agreement. Roche intends to acquire Spark in order to boost its play in a hot gene therapy market and gird its hemophilia portfolio—both competitive fields without a clear path to a monopoly, according to Jefferies analyst Michael Yee.

Although previous delays allowed U.S. regulators more time to review the deal, the June filing added a new wrinkle into the process, with the FTC investigating whether the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has jurisdiction over the proposed acquisition.

RELATED: Roche pushes back Spark tender a third time. Will it close the deal on time—or ever?

If so, the CMA has filed an interim order that would require Roche to hold Philadelphia-based Spark as a separate entity rather than merging into a single company. Roche said that outcome wouldn’t be a major hindrance to the deal, as it plans to maintain Spark’s presence in Pennsylvania as an "independent company" after the merger.  

Suggested Articles

The efficacy between Keytruda and FerGene's nadofaragene firadenovec look comparable in their studies, though Merck has at least one upper hand.

Thursday, the FDA approved the first three generic versions of Gilenya, but they may not hit the market anytime soon due to ongoing litigation.

Gilead is hoping to score a patent extension on TAF meds, but patient advocates say that would reward conduct that harmed patients.