No monitoring for Vioxx-takers, court says

Slowly but surely Merck is working its way off the Vioxx hook. First, the successful fight-em-one-by-one strategy, then the big settlement, then a few key overturned verdicts--and now, the New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that the drugmaker doesn't have to monitor Vioxx patients for future health problems. The 5-1 decision nullifies a class action lawsuit, filed by Vioxx users who don't have symptoms but wanted to be tested for any hidden problems.

The ruling states that patients can't pursue claims for medical monitoring unless they show "harm." Because these plaintiffs had no injuries to report, no harm done--in a legal sense, anyway.

- check out Merck's release
- read the Los Angeles Times story
- see the article in the Star-Ledger

Suggested Articles

Post-Tesaro buyout, don’t expect GlaxoSmithKline to spring for more commercial-stage oncology products anytime soon.

Already a fast-growing blockbuster, Novo Nordisk's injectable Ozempic won a major heart-helping FDA nod that could bode well for its oral sibling.

Bayer's new Vitrakvi for tumors with NTRK gene fusions is meeting skepticism in England and Germany, where cost watchdogs on Friday rejected it.