Drug marketing costs double R&D

Every self-respecting pharma exec will tell you: R&D is the industry's peculiar burden, the chief reason why brand-name drugs are so expensive. But the average Joe or Jane consumer thinks that's, er, a lot of bunk. It's marketing that drives the costs of their meds ever upward.

Now, a couple of academics have the figures. After combing through market research, they found that pharma spent $57.5 billion on marketing in 2004--almost twice the $31.5 billion spent on research that year, according to the National Science Foundation. And the research numbers include public funding, not just company expenses.

The data "confirms the public image of a marketing-driven industry," the study authors wrote. It also shows that the industry needs to be redirected toward research and away from brand-building, they wrote. Just how might that redirection happen? They didn't say.

- see this release release
-get the journal article from PLoS Medicine

Suggested Articles

Alnylam is ready to follow on its Onpattro launch with an FDA nod for Givlaari. But the drug's safety profile is giving analysts reason to pause.

FDA nominee Stephen Hahn faced questions from Senators on Wednesday on topics including drug pricing, biosimilars, opioids and more.

BMS’ Opdivo-Yervoy combo been game-changing in late-stage melanoma. But when it comes to expanding the pair’s reach, the company has hit a roadblock.