Data backs use of J&J's Cypher stent

On the scales of stent safety, the evidence is piling up in favor of the previously discredited drug-coated models--Johnson & Johnson's Cypher in particular. On top of positive research announced at last week's European cardiology congress comes a new meta-analytical study, published in today's Lancet, that concludes patients with drug-eluting stents don't have a greater risk of death than patients whose stents are bare.

Unfortunately for Boston Scientific, the study also suggested that patients implanted with the company's Taxus stent had a slightly increased risk of heart attack when compared with patients with Cypher stents. Taxus patients also were a bit more likely to develop blood clots and to require follow-up procedures, the study shows.

- here's J&J's release
- read the article from The New York Times

Related Articles:
Little common ground in stent controversy. Report
Congress spotlights J&J stent ops. Report
Decline in drug-coated stent use at cardiac centers. Report
Insurers may cut stent payouts. Report

Suggested Articles

Merck KGaA has big plans for a site in Switzerland where it intends to knit together biologics development and manufacturing. 

Biocon’s key biosimilars plant in Bengaluru, India, has gotten mixed reviews from the FDA and has now received a Form 483 with five observations.

Eli Lilly and Incyte are investing heavily in JAK inhibitor Olumiant's chances in atopic dermatitis, but does it stand a chance against Dupixent?