FDA delivers Form 483 to Eisai plant in U.S.

An Eisai plant in Baltimore has been issued an FDA Form 483.

Japan’s Eisai, which has reduced its manufacturing operations in the U.S., is now facing regulatory concerns for a plant in Baltimore, Maryland.

The facility has received an FDA Form 483 with 5 observations for a both quality issues and data record keeping, FDA News reports.

The FDA cited the facility for failing to follow established drug testing procedures and it failure to take steps to fix problems in relation to test failures. It also cited the facility for not protecting data with single-use passwords to prevent analysts from having the ability to get into and delete sensitive data, a problem the FDA has cited a many other facilities.

Free Daily Newsletter

Like this story? Subscribe to FiercePharma!

Biopharma is a fast-growing world where big ideas come along daily. Our subscribers rely on FiercePharma as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data on drugs and the companies that make them. Sign up today to get pharma news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

Eisai, which has been revamping some operations in the last few years in the face of generic competition, in 2015 stepped away from a manufacturing facility in North Carolina that it shared with Biogen. Biogen, which had been leasing an oral solid-dose operation in Research Triangle Park from Eisai, took over the rest of the plant, which included filling lines, taking on about 100 Eisai employees at the time. Several months later, facing its own cost pressures, Biogen cut about 130 jobs at the plant as part of a broader cost-cutting effort.


Suggested Articles

Glenmark hopes to raise cash from selling drugs outside of its focus therapeutic areas and from finding new investors for its API and innovation spinoffs.

Sun's Shanghvi took a 99% pay cut last year. Dr. Reddy's copies of Copaxone and NuvaRing were rejected by the FDA. Natco eyes China amid hardship.

Pfizer says two lots of migraine med Relpax failed to meet microbial standards and may be contaminated with genera pseudomonas and burkholderia.