FierceBiotechFierceBioResearcherFierceVaccinesFiercePharma   FierceHealthcare

Free Newsletter

Get the pharma industry's daily monitor, with a special focus on pharmaceutical company news and the market development of FDA approved products. Sign up for free today!

About | Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> Stent | Boston Scientific | Controversy

Study: Coated stents aren't cost-effective

Tools

If drug-eluting stents were on the shelves at Costco, most value-conscious customers wouldn't buy. A new Swiss study has found that the coated stents aren't cost-effective for most patients--and wouldn't be even if prices were cut substantially. In fact, it would be "almost impossible" for the more expensive stents to become cost-effective in low-risk patients. That doesn't hold out much hope to manufacturers Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific.

But here's one positive to comfort stent makers. They're a good value for a subset of high-risk patients, concluded the study, published in this week's The Lancet. In these patients, who had small-vessel or bypass-graft stenting, the drug-coated versions were cost-effective. In some cases, the coated stents saved money that would have been spent treating complications.

-read The Lancet's release about the study

Related Articles:
Little common ground in stent controversy. Report
Tough times for stent market. Report
Congress spotlights J&J stent ops. Report
Medical device makers to fund stent safety study. Report
Decline in drug-coated stent use at cardiac centers. Report

More stories about Stent   Boston Scientific   Controversy  

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 32 + 3?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.