FierceBiotech FierceBiotech IT FiercePharma FierceMedicalDevices
FierceBiotech Research FierceVaccines FiercePharma Manufacturing FierceDrugDelivery

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> Stent | Boston Scientific | Controversy

Study: Coated stents aren't cost-effective

Tools

If drug-eluting stents were on the shelves at Costco, most value-conscious customers wouldn't buy. A new Swiss study has found that the coated stents aren't cost-effective for most patients--and wouldn't be even if prices were cut substantially. In fact, it would be "almost impossible" for the more expensive stents to become cost-effective in low-risk patients. That doesn't hold out much hope to manufacturers Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific.

But here's one positive to comfort stent makers. They're a good value for a subset of high-risk patients, concluded the study, published in this week's The Lancet. In these patients, who had small-vessel or bypass-graft stenting, the drug-coated versions were cost-effective. In some cases, the coated stents saved money that would have been spent treating complications.

-read The Lancet's release about the study

Related Articles:
Little common ground in stent controversy. Report
Tough times for stent market. Report
Congress spotlights J&J stent ops. Report
Medical device makers to fund stent safety study. Report
Decline in drug-coated stent use at cardiac centers. Report


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FiercePharma Email Newsletter:

More stories about Controversy   Stent   Boston Scientific