Free Newsletter
Stimulus gives $1.1B to comparative studies
Obama, one; pharma lobbyists, zero. When the new president signs the $787 billion stimulus bill, he'll be launching something drugmakers sought to quash: funding for comparative effectiveness research.
As you know, that funding to compare various strategies for medical treatments was included in the bill's first draft. But drugmakers were worried about the language the House of Representatives' version used; they wanted the research to focus only on effectiveness--not cost-effectiveness. And in a broader sense, the industry worried that government would be intruding into people's healthcare, perhaps denying treatments to people who really need it. Or that the research would be broad and generalized, ignoring the very real individual differences in patient response to various drugs.
It's too early to tell whether those fears might be realized. What's known is that the Department of Health and Human Services will get $1.1 billion--some of it to evaluate clinical studies that have already been done, some to conduct new clinical trials.
- read the New York Times story
Related Articles:
Comparative effectiveness bill hits Senate
Bill to propose federal drug comparisons
Pact adds cost effectiveness to drug study
How will Obama change pharma?
PhRMA poised to fight Obama plans
Paid Research Reports
- Trends in mHealth and Telemedicine
- The Global Aesthetic Dermatology Market Outlook
- Future Directions in Regenerative Medicine
- Pipeline Insight: Insulin Antidiabetics – Novel analogs show promise as alternative delivery methods prove less attractive
- Pipeline Insight: Non-insulin Antidiabetics - Rise of the weight-reducers: Once-weekly GLP-1 agonists and novel SGLT-2 inhibitor
- Forecast Insight: Antidiabetics - Diabetes market growth driven by epidemiological trends and rich pipeline


SHARE
WITH: