Free Newsletter
Insurgents grab two Amylin board seats
To hear Amylin Pharmaceuticals and its dissidents talk, it's a win-win situation. Both sides claimed victory in their fierce proxy battle, which wrapped up yesterday with a vote at the company's annual meeting. And to an extent, both are correct, according to preliminary vote tallies. The dissidents did capture two seats on the board of directors. And from Amylin's point of view, the dissidents only captured two seats, rather than the five they'd sought.
Amylin crowed that the election showed support for management's strategy. "Today's outcome affirms that shareholders have confidence in the company's plan to build value in 2009 and beyond, having apparently elected only two of the five dissident nominees." The company pledged to work with the two directors Eastbourne Capital Management and Carl Icahn forced upon it. Meanwhile, Eastbourne's founder thanked shareholders for "sending a strong message that the past results are not acceptable" and also promised to work "constructively" with the new board.
Here's how things will stand if the preliminary vote count holds true. Eastbourne and Icahn, which together own 21 percent of the company, will have two seats on the 12-member board. Those directors won't be able to exert control, but they will be able to lobby the rest of the board. The dissidents have been looking for a management shake-up--including a new CEO--and suggested an outright sale as well. We'll have to wait and see how it all plays out, but whatever happens, Amylin will be fun to watch in the coming months.
- read the Amylin release
- see the statement from Eastbourne
- check out the New York Times article
Related Articles:
Amylin dissidents win investor support
Proxy advisers back Amylin dissidents' slate
Is Amylin caving to proxy pressure?
No meeting of the minds at Amylin
Amylin: Icahn aims for sale to Lilly
Comments
What will be interesting is if electing two dissidents will trigger Amylin's poison puts. These are contractual provisions in debt agreements and indentures that provide for the acceleration of the debt whenever there is some type of change of control. Change of control can have a myriad of definitions. You wouldn't think provisions could be triggered by the election of two directors... let's see.
Post new comment
Paid Research Reports
- Stakeholder Opinions: Vaccines in Emerging Markets (Asia) - Opportunities in China, India, South Korea and Taiwan
- Big Pharma Performance Before, During and Beyond the Global Recession
- Optimizing Lifecycle Management: Maximizing commercial lifespan through label expansion and combination products
- The CRO Market Outlook: Emerging markets, leading players and future trends
- Pharmaceutical Sales Force Effectiveness Strategies
- Commercial Insight: Influenza Vaccines and Antivirals - The pandemic's long-term impact





