FierceBiotechFierceBioResearcherFierceVaccinesFiercePharma   FierceHealthcare

Free Newsletter

Get the pharma industry's daily monitor, with a special focus on pharmaceutical company news and the market development of FDA approved products. Sign up for free today!

About | Sample | Privacy

Sen. Grassley: No disclosure, no NIH money

Tools

Sen. Charles Grassley is at it again. The perennial pharma critic has been knocking university researchers who don't fully disclose their ties to the drug industry--and pushing the National Institutes of Health to police that disclosure. Now Grassley is spurring universities themselves to hand over the info. The Senate Finance Committee sent letters to 20 institutions asking for potential conflicts of interest with drugmakers.

Adding urgency to that call for information was Grassley's own disclosure that a University of Texas researcher hadn't reported $150,000 in speaking fees from GlaxoSmithKline. That researcher, Karen Wagner, had worked on NIH-funded studies of GSK's antidepressant Paxil.

Meanwhile, NIH director Dr. Elias Zerhouni met yesterday with Grassley's committee staff; presumably they hashed over Grassley's calls for NIH to yank funding from universities that don't disclose all payments from pharma. "Starting today, the NIH could send a signal that business as usual is over," Grassley told the Wall Street Journal. "The simple threat of losing prestigious and sizable NIH grants would force accurate financial disclosure."

- read the Wall Street Journal story
- check out the article in the Washington Post

Related Articles:
Barriers falling between pharma and academia
Universities, public institutes lead biotech revolution
Arms twisted, pharma promises disclosure

More stories about universities   NIH   Disclosure   Charles Grassley   academic research   Conflict of interest  

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 20 + 75?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.