FierceBiotech FierceBiotech IT FiercePharma FierceMedicalDevices
FierceBiotech Research FierceVaccines FiercePharma Manufacturing FierceDrugDelivery

Free Newsletter

About | View Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> FDA update | animal drugs | Animal health

FDA looks to restrict animal antibiotic use

Tools

The new FDA is stepping into the debate over antibiotics in livestock. Deputy Commissioner Joshua Sharfstein (photo) wrote to the House Rules Committee, supporting restrictions on use of the drugs. It should be verboten to feed antibiotics to farm animals that aren't sick, Sharfstein wrote, adding that farmers shouldn't be able to give antibiotics to their animals without veterinary supervision. Rep. Louise Slaughter, who chairs that committee, has proposed a ban on animal use of seven types of antibiotics, plus restriction of other antibiotic drugs to mostly therapeutic uses.

As you know, there's been vigorous disagreement over animal antibiotics. The Union of Concerned Scientists says that some 70 percent of antibiotics used in the U.S. are given to healthy livestock and poultry to boost growth or prevent illness. Farmers say they need the drugs to raise healthy animals; human health advocates point to research suggesting that overuse of antibiotics in animals help germs develop drug resistance. This new legislation amounts to a microcosm of that debate. It's supported by the American Medical Association, but opposed by the farm lobby, including the National Pork Producers Council. The bill probably won't get anywhere on its own, but supporters hope it might in some way be attached to healthcare reform legislation. 

Interestingly, this latest skirmish comes at a time when drugmakers are furiously bidding for animal-health assets that have come up for possible sale because of Big Pharma megamergers. If the transactions materialize, they'll add up to billions. So how does a diversified drugmaker feel about antibiotics in animals? After all, if the resistance studies are true, then its antibiotics grow less useful the more veterinary drugs are used. But at the same time, restricting that use could cut into animal-health sales. What do you think?

- read the New York Times story
- get the latest on the animal-health sales from Bloomberg
- check out the FDA's antimicrobial resistance page

Related Articles:
Big Pharma bids for animal-health assets
Bayer aims to buy animal-health spinoff
Merck raises $4B as FTC studies merger
Merck scouts buyers for animal-health ops
To buy Wyeth, Pfizer may need to sell animal biz


SHARE
WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FiercePharma Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment
More stories about FDA update   animal drugs   Animal health  

Comments

Encouraging to know that at least 2 people in Washington know the correct way in which to raise animals and the wrong way to do it which only encourages the use of more and more drugs as the animals get used to it. Nothing like eating meat that's full of drugs that a person could be allergic to and if they raised the animals by not factory farming, they should only need to use a drug if a situation arises from that animal. We also need to stop putting the drugs into the feed that we buy. It is not needed nor wanted by those of us who are good stewards of the land.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.