FierceBiotechFierceBioResearcherFierceVaccinesFiercePharma   FierceHealthcare

Free Newsletter

Get the pharma industry's daily monitor, with a special focus on pharmaceutical company news and the market development of FDA approved products. Sign up for free today!

About | Sample | Privacy
Related Topics >> Janet Woodcock | drug safety | CDER | FDA

FDA chief: Woodcock is a 'change agent'

Tools

No, says Andrew von Eschenbach, it's not business-as-usual at the FDA. A thousand times no. The agency commish got peeved during an appearance at the American Enterprise Institute when someone suggested that appointing Janet Woodcock (photo) to her former post at the top of CDER was a return to the "old ways" at the agency. Au contraire, he said. She's "going back as a very, very strong change agent," he responded.

Is von Eschenbach worried that folks inside the FDA are misinterpreting his choice of Woodcock? He told the audience at AEI that he'd been "emphatic" about explaining his view on Woodcock's role: that she will create a CDER "nothing like the CDER that she left." He may also, In Vivo points out, be worried about his legacy at the agency. And he could be sensitive to charges that Woodcock can't be much of a change agent if she's a lame duck with only a few months to serve before a new president might bring in his or her own people into the FDA. Or maybe he saw the question a veiled criticism of his own leadership. Which, given all the fires FDA is trying to put out these days, might be understandable.

- see the item at In Vivo

Related Articles:
FDA's Woodcock handed back the reins at CDER. Report
FDA taps new-yet-old drug chief. Report
The FDA: Caught between a rock and a hard place. Report
FDA moves to allay drug-import fears. Report
FDA can't guarantee drug safety. Report

More stories about Janet Woodcock   drug safety   CDER   FDA  

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 34 + 29?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.